Actual problems of innovative economy and law

Journal "Actual problems of innovative economy and law" is included in category B for specialties: in the field of knowledge "Management and administration": 073, 076 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 23.08.2023 No. 1035) and 071, 072, 075 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 12.20.2023 No. 1543); in the field of knowledge "Social and behavioral sciences" 051 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated August 23, 2023 No. 1035); in the field of knowledge "Law" - 081 and "Public management and administration" - 281 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 12.20.2023 No. 1543).
Registration of an entity in print media: Decision of the National Council of Ukraine on Television and Radio Broadcasting No. 1390 dated 11/16/2023. Media identifier: R30-02018
The journal is indexed in the International Scientific Center of Index Copernicus International

The problem of distinguishing between labour and civil contracts in the gig-economy

УДК: 349.2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2024-3-5

Ponomarenko Oksana,
Candidate of Science (in Law), Associate Professor of the Prof. O. I. Protsivsky Department, of Civil Law Disciplines and Labor Law at
H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University,
Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of the Economy of
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-1834


The author draws attention to the fact that the development of digital technologies has expanded the horizon of opportunities for the subjects of legal relations in which a person exercises the right to work. The subjects of these legal relations, independently exercising their freedom of will and acting in their interests, enter either a civil or an employment contract. However, given that in such legal relations, a person exercising the right to work is usually in the legal status of a weak party, society has faced the problem of abuse by employers. Employers have started giving labor relations, in essence, civil law structures, depriving employees of fundamental social and labor rights and guarantees or severely limiting them. In this regard, science, legislation, and judicial practice faced the problem of finding new approaches to distinguishing between civil and employment contracts, as the concepts of an employment contract established in science no longer correspond to modern conditions. Thus, with the emergence of remote work and other non-traditional forms of labor, the features of a traditional employment contract, which allowed distinguishing it from a contractor agreement, ceased to perform the distinguishing function. The article aims to formulate a new approach to defining the distinguishing features of an employment contract and a civil contract in the digital economy. The author’s analysis of legislation, scientific literature, and case law has concluded that an employment contract in the digital economy has variable features. This means there is a need for legislative consolidation of variants of the features of an employment contract. If two or more of them are present, this will allow recognition of an agreement under which a person exercises the right to work as an employment contract. At the same time, the article draws attention to the fact that a decision in this category of cases should meet the following requirements: The focus when deciding on the legal nature of the contract concluded should be on establishing which contract the person exercising his/her right to work intended. The court should avoid formalism and base its decision on facts. The primary purpose of such a decision is to effectively protect the labor and social rights of a person exercising the right to work.

Keywords: right to labour, labour relations, employment contract, employee, employer, employment, remote work, freedom of will of the parties to the employment contract, social function of labour law, guarantees, IT sector, contractual regulation, amendment of an employment contract.

References.

  1. Joseph, V. (2016). «Kennedy Three Paths to Update Labor. Law for the Gig Economy». Information technology & innovation foundation. Available at: https://www2.itif.org/2016-labor-law-gig-economy.pdf.
  2. Novikov, D.O. (2015). «Work in the information society: conclusions for labor law». Pravo i suspil’stvo. Issue 5–2. рр. 96-103.
  3. Novikov, D.O., Luk’ianchykov, O.M. (2019). «About the prospects of labor law in the gig economy». Problemy realizatsii prav hromadian u sferi pratsi ta sotsial’noho zabezpechennia. [Pro perspektyvy trudovoho prava u hih-ekonomitsi]. Proceeding of the Materials of the IX Mizhnar. nauk.‑ konf., iaka prysviachena 50‑richchiu stvorennia kafedry trudovoho prava Natsional’noho iurydychnoho universytetu im. Yaroslava Mudroho. Pravo. Kharkiv. Ukraine. Available at: http://dspace.hnpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3626.
  4. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u spravi. (2021). [Resolution of the Supreme Court in case]. № 420/2174/19 dated June 9, 2021. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/97533766.
  5. Novikov, D.O., Luk’ianchykov, O.M. (2020). «The civil character of the changes in the Code of Labor Laws of Ukraine related to the introduction of legal regulation of remote work». Yurydychnyj naukovyj elektronyj zhurnal. № 4. рр. 100-102
  6. Simutina, Ya.V. (2020). «Changing the traditional approach to defining the concept of an employment contract and its consequences for law enforcement». Problemy rozvytku sotsial’no-trudovykh prav ta profspilkovoho rukhu v Ukraini. [Zmina tradytsijnoho pidkhodu do vyznachennia poniattia trudovoho dohovoru ta ii naslidky dlia pravozastosuvannia]. Proceeding of the Materials of the VIII Vseukrains’koi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav. Xarkiv.
  7. Kovalenko, O.O. (2020). «The threat of the expansion of labor law to civilians in light of the change in the definition of “employment contract”, or what the changes aimed at providing additional social guarantees in connection with the cessation of the corona virus disease (COVID-19) lead to». Problemy rozvytku sotsial’no-trudovykh prav ta profspilkovoho rukhu v Ukraini. [Zahroza ekspansii trudovoho prava tsyvil’nym u svitli zminy definitsii «trudovyj dohovir», abo do choho vedut’ zminy, spriamovani na zabezpechennia dodatkovykh sotsial’nykh harantij u zv’iazku z polyshenniam koronavirsunoi khvoroby (COVID-19)]. Proceeding of the Materials of the VIII Vseukrains’koi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav. Kharkiv.
  8. Simutina, Ya. (2021). Poniattia ta oznaky trudovykh pravovidnosyn u konteksti poshyrennia nestandartnoï zay̆ Kukhnia trudovykh prav: narysy pro vazhlyvi inhrediienty. [Concepts and signs of labor relations in the context of the spread of non-standard employment]. VD Dakor. Kyïv. Ukraine.
  9. Rekomendatsii MOP pro trudovi pravovidnosyny. (2006). [ILO Recommendations on Labor Relations]. N 198. Available at: https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312535.
  10. Shumylo, M.M. (2023). «Non-standard labor and contractual relations on digital platforms». Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky. Vol. 11. рр. 94-99.
  11. Proekt Zakonu pro vnesennia zmin do Kodeksu zakoniv pro pratsiu Ukrainy schodo vyznachennia poniattia trudovykh vidnosyn ta oznak ikh naiavnosti. (2021). [Draft Law on Amendments to the Labor Code of Ukraine on Defining the Concept of Labor Relations and Signs of Their Presence]. № 5054 dated February 9, 2021. Available at: https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=71071.

The article was received 29.03.2024


Quote article, APA style

Ponomarenko O. 29.03.2024. The problem of distinguishing between labour and civil contracts in the gig-economy. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2024. №3. 24-30 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2024-3-5

Quote article, MLA style

Ponomarenko O. The problem of distinguishing between labour and civil contracts in the gig-economy. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 29.03.2024. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2024-3-5