УДК: 330.34
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-1-26
Published: 19.01.26
The agricultural sector of the economy is the embodiment of the intertwining of economic, social and environmental systems, which directly determines the need to ensure the unity of all components of its sustainable development: economic efficiency of production, social justice in remuneration of employees, decent living and working conditions, environmental safety and balance of ecosystems. The structure of the agrarian sector of the Ukrainian economy in terms of enterprise size is heterogeneous. The aim of the article is to determine the features of sustainable development of agricultural enterprises of different sizes in Ukraine based on a comparative analysis of their growth trends, profitability as a criterion of efficiency and wages and employment as criteria of social responsibility. Quantitative methods were used for the study, in particular, index, grouping, average values. The analysis was based on data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine on the activities of enterprises in agriculture, forestry and fisheries in 2011–2024. A comparative analysis of sustainable development of enterprises of different sizes in agriculture, forestry and fisheries by the criterion of efficiency showed that large enterprises were the leaders in terms of growth of net income from sales, total income, the level of profitability of operating and all activities in the studied period. Also, large enterprises demonstrated the best results of sustainable development by the criterion of social responsibility, which was assessed based on indicators of labor costs, labor costs per employee and the dynamics of number of employed workers. Such analysis is important both for identifying trends in the modern structurally heterogeneous agrarian sector of the Ukrainian economy and for developing management decisions at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels. In further studies, comparative analysis should be conducted considering a larger set of criteria and indicators of sustainable development.
Keywords: sustainable development, efficiency, social responsibility, profit, profitability, productivity, income, costs, wage, employment, agrarian enterprises.
References.
- Andrijchuk,H. (2013). Ekonomika pidpryiemstv ahrarnoho kompleksu. [Economics of agricultural enterprises]. KNEU. Kyiv. Ukraine.
- Antoschenkova,V., Dejneha, M.V., Hlian’, T.I. (2025). «ESG and sustainable development: modern trends». Zhurnal z menedzhmentu, ekonomiky ta tekhnolohij. № 4. рр. 176-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69803/3083-6034-2025-4-176.
- Hudz’,Ye. (2015). «The role of innovations in ensuring the competitiveness and efficiency of the enterprise». Visnyk Kharkivs’koho natsional’noho tekhnichnoho universytetu sil’s’koho hospodarstva: Ekonomichni nauky. Issue 161. рр. 3-10.
- (2025). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Statystychna informatsiia. [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua.
- Kadyrus,H., Dons’kykh, A.S., Tereschenko, V.A. (2020). «Formation of a development strategy for an agricultural enterprise». Efektyvna ekonomika. № 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.7.64.
- Pysarenko,, Bahan, N., Sobchyshyn, V., Havrykh, R., Zhukhovs’kyj, I., Moshenets’, N. (2024). «Sustainable development of agricultural innovation-oriented enterprises by means of logistics management». Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice. № 3(56). рр. 533–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.56.2024.4424.
- Tul’chyns’kyj,V. (2025). «Formation of a strategy for the sustainable development of agricultural enterprises». Ekonomika ta suspil’stvo. № 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-77-75.
- Khudolej,Yu., Karpenko, O.O., Biriukov, Ye.I. (2025). «System for assessing and monitoring the sustainable development of enterprises». Economic Synergy. Issue 1. рр. 8–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53920/ES-2025-1-1.
- Fesenko,, Stupniker, H., Motiienko, S. (2022). «Analysis of the profitability of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine as a factor in increasing economic potential during martial law». Ekonomika ta suspil’stvo. № 46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-46-29.
- Comporek, М. (2024). «EGS scores, earning management and financial performance: evidence from Poland». Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice. № 5(58). рр. 185–198. DOI: https://doi.org/55643/fcaptp.5.58.2024.4540.
- (2003) Small businesses, job creation and growth: facts, obstacles and best practices.
- United Nations. (2025). Micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises day 27 June. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/observances/micro-small-medium-businesses-day.
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Document of the General Assembly. Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/L.1&Lang=E.
Quote article, APA style
Onegina V. Sustainable development of agricultural enterprises of different sizes: a comparative analysis based on efficiency and social responsibility criteria. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2026. №1. 122-127 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-1-26
Quote article, MLA style
Onegina V. Sustainable development of agricultural enterprises of different sizes: a comparative analysis based on efficiency and social responsibility criteria. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-1-26
