Actual problems of innovative economy and law

Journal "Actual problems of innovative economy and law" is included in category B for specialties: in the field of knowledge "Management and administration": 073, 076 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 23.08.2023 No. 1035) and 071, 072, 075 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 12.20.2023 No. 1543); in the field of knowledge "Social and behavioral sciences" 051 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated August 23, 2023 No. 1035); in the field of knowledge "Law" - 081 and "Public management and administration" - 281 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 12.20.2023 No. 1543).
Registration of an entity in print media: Decision of the National Council of Ukraine on Television and Radio Broadcasting No. 1390 dated 11/16/2023. Media identifier: R30-02018
The journal is indexed in the International Scientific Center of Index Copernicus International

Micro- and macroeconomic determinants of sustainable land resource management

# 29 160-163 Download/view the full text of the article

УДК: 332.3:338.2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-4-29

Kupriianchyk Iryna Petrivna,
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Land Resources Management,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-2128

The article aims to advance the theoretical and methodological foundations for analyzing micro- and macroeconomic determinants of sustainable land resource management and to substantiate a mechanism for coordinating them. The research applies systemic, institutional, and ecological-economic approaches, complemented by analysis and synthesis, comparison, scientific generalization, and causal modeling. The study systematizes the determinants that shape land-use decisions at the microeconomic level, including land productivity, production costs, output prices, access to finance, tenure security, risk and time preferences, and managerial capacity. At the macroeconomic and institutional levels, the decisive factors include the cost of capital, inflation, public support, market infrastructure, land institutions, environmental regulation, information infrastructure, and the security environment. The results show that sustainable outcomes depend on consistent financial incentives, environmental requirements, monitoring, and risk management rather than on the intensity of a single policy instrument. Private financial efficiency is distinguished from broader social and economic feasibility, which is especially important for restoring agricultural land affected by military activities and explosive ordnance contamination. The scientific novelty consists in a conceptual model of sustainable land management performance and a cyclical mechanism linking individual decisions with macroeconomic, institutional, ecological, and security conditions. The practical significance lies in recommendations for differentiated public support, integrating demining with post-clearance soil assessment and land-use recovery planning, developing open information infrastructure, and using multicriteria methods to prioritize restoration measures. Further research should focus on empirical validation using farm-level data, discounted cash-flow analysis, monetization of ecosystem and security benefits, and spatial multicriteria modeling.

Keywords: sustainable development, land resource management, microeconomic determinants, macroeconomic determinants, economic mechanism, land restoration, ecosystem services, demining.

References.

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025). The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture 2025: The Potential to Produce More and Better. FAO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd7488en
  2. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (2022). Global Land Outlook 2: Land Restoration for Recovery and Resilience. UNCCD. URL: https://www.unccd.int/resources/global-land-outlook/global-land-outlook-2nd-edition
  3. European Commission. (2021). EU Soil Strategy for 2030: Reaping the Benefits of Healthy Soils for People, Food, Nature and Climate (COM(2021) 699 final). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0699
  4. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2025). Directive (EU) 2025/2360 of 12 November 2025 on soil monitoring and resilience (Soil Monitoring Law). Official Journal of the European Union. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2025/2360/oj/eng
  5. Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Panagos, P., Lugato, E., Yang, J. E., Alewell, C., Wuepper, D., Montanarella, L., & Ballabio, C. (2020). Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015–2070). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(36), pp. 21994–22001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001403117
  6. World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Commission, & United Nations. (2026). Ukraine: Fifth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA5): February 2022–December 2025. World Bank. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/c52d910e-e4f9-4bcd-9257-6867bdd89dd4
  7. Ministry of Economy and Environment of Ukraine. (2026). Pidsumky humanitarnoho rozminuvannia za lypen [Results of humanitarian demining for July]. URL: https://www.me.gov.ua/News/Detail/abc367e0-9e9a-47e8-8a95-22722070129d?isSpecial=True&lang=uk-UA&title=PidsumkiGumanitarnogoRozminuvanniaZaLipen
  8. Bartkowski, B., Bartke, S., Helming, K., Paul, C., Techen, A. K., & Hansjürgens, B. (2020). Potential of the economic valuation of soil-based ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy. PeerJ, 8, e8749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8749
  9. Begho, T., Glenk, K., Anik, A. R., & Eory, V. (2022). A systematic review of factors that influence farmers’ adoption of sustainable crop farming practices: Lessons for sustainable nitrogen management in South Asia. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 1(2), pp. 149–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12016
  10. Olumba, C. N., Garrod, G., & Areal, F. J. (2024). Time Preferences, Land Tenure Security, and the Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices in Southeast Nigeria. Sustainability, 16(5), 1747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051747
  11. Panagos, P., Montanarella, L., Barbero, M., Schneegans, A., Aguglia, L., & Jones, A. (2022). Soil priorities in the European Union. Geoderma Regional, 29, e00510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00510
  12. Shebanina, V., Kormyshkin, A., Kliuchnyk, V., Reshetilov, G., & Zhebko, O. (2024). Management of sustainable land use projects in accordance with EU requirements. Scientific Horizons, 27(10), pp. 148–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor10.2024.148
  13. Hrabchuk, I., Buhaichuk, V., Tkachuk, V., & Tymchak, V. (2024). Stratehichne upravlinnia zemelnymy resursamy v umovakh viiny ta povoiennoho vidnovlennia ahrarnoho sektora Ukrainy [Strategic management of land resources in the context of war and post-war recovery of the agricultural sector of Ukraine]. Aktualni pytannia ekonomichnykh nauk, (5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14231913
  14. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2024). V Ukraini pidpysaly pershyi dohovir na rozminuvannia ahrozemel za derzhavnoiu prohramoiu [The first contract for demining agricultural land under the state program was signed in Ukraine]. URL: https://www.me.gov.ua/News/Detail/a47d68dc-d7a0-4a20-a690-055780c95c91
  15. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2021). Metodyka rozrakhunku pokaznykiv derzhavnoho statystychnoho sposterezhennia “Ploshchi, valovi zbory ta urozhainist silskohospodarskykh kultur” (nakaz No. 296 vid 30.11.2021) [Methodology for calculating indicators of the state statistical observation “Areas, gross harvests and yields of agricultural crops” (Order No. 296 of 30.11.2021)]. URL: https://stat.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2026-04/296_2021.pdf

Quote article, APA style

Kupriianchyk I. P. Micro- and macroeconomic determinants of sustainable land resource management. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2026. №4. 160-163 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-4-29

Quote article, MLA style

Kupriianchyk I. P. Micro- and macroeconomic determinants of sustainable land resource management. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-4-29