УДК: 332.122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-1-20
Published: 19.01.26
Deepening decentralization and the challenges of post-war recovery highlight the need to rethink inclusive governance of local communities as centers of public authority and service provision. The article proves that information and communication support for local self-government bodies (LSGB) is an “infrastructure of trust” that reduces the transaction costs of interaction between authorities and residents, strengthens the legitimacy of management decisions, and creates conditions for stakeholder participation in policy-making. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the institutional paradigm of information and communication support for inclusive governance and to determine the role of LGA digitalization in the formation of inclusive development institutions, taking into account internal and external factors. The methodology combines an institutional approach, regulatory and comparative analysis, content analysis of web resources and digital communication channels of communities, as well as structural and functional modeling of the links between “institutions – communications – inclusiveness – development”. It has been established that digital transformation enhances inclusiveness only if procedures for informing, consulting, processing proposals, motivated decision-making, and public reporting are institutionalized; without this, digital tools become a communication «showcase». Key risks (digital divides, process fragmentation, imitation of participation, cyber threats) are identified and the need for an anti-risk policy framework for local self-government is justified. The scientific novelty lies in the systematization of factors and mechanisms of inclusive governance and the formation of a framework for assessing the information and communication capacity of the community. The practical significance is the identification of priorities for the integration of digital channels into the management cycle and the basis for an integrated index of communication capacity.
Keywords: public administration, information and communication support, digitization, territorial communities, local self-government bodies, institutional paradigm, inclusive development, interaction, institutions of inclusive development, internal and external factors of inclusive governance.
References.
- Zhukovska, A., & Zheliuk, T. (2025). Inkliuzyvnyi rozvytok terytorialnykh hromad v umovakh viiny ta pisliavoiennoi vidbudovy [Inclusive development of territorial communities under war conditions and post-war reconstruction]. Herald of Economics, no. 4, pp. 24-27. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2025.04.024.
- Shestakovska, T., Hololobov, S., & Kyrychenko, H. (2025). Liderstvo v mistsevomu samovriaduvanni yak instrument analitychnoi diialnosti ta komunikatyvnoho zabezpechennia inkliuzyvnoho terytorialnoho rozvytku [Leadership in local self-government as a tool for analytical activity and communicative support of inclusive territorial development]. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, no. 338.1, pp. 317-323. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-338-47.
- Hubenko, V. (2022). Upravlinska diialnist v chastyni zabezpechennia komunikatsiinoi polityky v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Management activities regarding communication policy assurance under martial law]. Public Administration: Concepts, Paradigm, Development, Improvement, no. 2, pp. 105–122. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2022-2-105-122.
- Bondarchuk, N. V. (2022). Vzaiemoia orhaniv publichnoi vlady ta hromadianskoho suspilstva v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii [Interaction of public authorities and civil society in the conditions of digitalization]. Public Administration and Administration in Ukraine, iss. 28, pp. 36-39. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2023.9.3.
- Kurnosenko, L. (2024). Protsesnyi pidkhid v systemi naukovo-praktychnykh pidkhodiv do upravlinnia kryzoiu: potentsial dlia intehratsii ta synerhii [Process approach in the system of scientific and practical approaches to crisis management: potential for integration and synergy]. Scientific Perspectives, no. 3(45), pp. 15–22. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2024-3(45)-19-32.
- (2022). Recommendation of the Council on Open Government. OECD Legal Instruments. Available at: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/359/359.en.pdf.
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2011). Law of Ukraine “On Access to Public Information” 2939-VI. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en-sr/2939-17.
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1997). Law of Ukraine “On Local Self-Government in Ukraine” 280/97-VR. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-vr.
- United Nations. (2024). UN E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024.
- (2024). Responsible and Accountable Institutions. Available at: https://www.undp.org/eurasia/our-focus/governance-and-peacebuilding/responsible-and-accountable-institutions.
- (n.d.). What does “inclusive governance” mean? Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/what-does-inclusive-governance-mean_960f5a97-en.html.
- Arnstein, Sh. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, no. 35.4, pp. 216-224.
- World Bank. (2014). Strategic Framework For Mainstreaming Citizen Engagement In World Bank Group Operations. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/266371468124780089/pdf/929570WP0Box380ategicFrameworkforCE.pdf.
- North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
- Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, A. J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Profile Books.
- World Bank. (2023). How to Strengthen Citizen Engagement. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099020006292211362/pdf/P17197000100980a0a6710bb6b3d898747.pdf.
- Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2017). Konceptsiia rozvytku elektronnoi demokratii v Ukraini [Concept of e-democracy development in Ukraine]. Decree No. 797-r. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/797-2017-%D1%80.
- Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2015). Polozhennia pro nabory danykh, yaki pidliahaiut opryliudnienniu u formi vidkrytykh danykh [Regulation on datasets subject to publication in the form of open data]. Resolution No. 835. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/835-2015-%D0%BF.
- E-Dem. (n.d.). Yedyna systema elektronnykh petytsii [Unified system of electronic petitions]. Available at: https://petition.e-dem.ua/.
- Ministry for Communities, Territories and Infrastructure Development of Ukraine. (2024). Bila knyha derzhavnoi polityky [White Book of State Policy]. Available at: https://decentralization.gov.ua/uploads/library/file/915/White_Book_web_2024.pdf.
- Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (n.d.). Reiestr vidkrytykh danykh [Open Data Portal]. Available at: https://data.gov.ua/dataset/reiestr-vidkritikh-danikh.
- Transparent Cities. (2024). Reitynh prozorosti 2024: yak mista vporalys iz novymy vyklykamy [Transparency Rating 2024: How cities handled new challenges]. Available at: https://transparentcities.in.ua/articles/reitynh-prozorosti-2024-yak-mista-vporalys-iz-novymy-vyklykamy.
Quote article, APA style
Pelekhatyi A. , Popadynets N. , Tymkovych O. Information and communication support for inclusive governance of territorial communities: institutional paradigm and digitalization of local government bodies. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2026. №1. 90-95 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-1-20
Quote article, MLA style
Pelekhatyi A. , Popadynets N. , Tymkovych O. Information and communication support for inclusive governance of territorial communities: institutional paradigm and digitalization of local government bodies. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-1-20
