УДК: 338.43:334.732(574)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-2-40
Published: 31.05.2026
The article analyzes the efficiency of agricultural cooperation in Kazakhstan’s livestock sector under existing institutional constraints that affect the development of the agrarian sector. The study aims to assess the role of cooperative forms of management in enhancing farm performance, identify factors that limit their potential, and propose measures to improve their effectiveness. The research methodology combines general scientific and specialized methods, including analysis, synthesis, statistical processing, and comparative approaches. The empirical base relies on official statistical data from the Republic of Kazakhstan, including materials from the Bureau of National Statistics and analytical reports of the Ministry of Agriculture for 2022–2024. The study applies dynamic and comparative methods to assess changes in the number of cooperatives, membership, and production volumes over time and across regions. It is established that although the number of cooperatives and the volume of their production have increased, the proportional participation of farms in cooperative activities and their contribution to total livestock output remain limited. Only about 2% of farms participate in cooperative forms, indicating low coverage and incomplete utilization of cooperative potential. The limited efficiency of cooperatives is caused by a combination of institutional and organizational-human factors, including low motivation for self-organization, insufficient managerial competencies, financial weakness, and historically formed distrust of collective management forms. It is demonstrated that under effective organizational models, strengthened management mechanisms, and the adoption of digital technology, cooperatives can play a crucial role in increasing the resilience, competitiveness, and sustainability of small farms, expanding access to markets and financial resources, and enhancing regional food security. A coordinated set of institutional, organizational, and technological measures is proposed to improve cooperative efficiency, including the transformation of state support, development of managerial competencies, and digitalization of cooperative operations. These measures also emphasize capacity-building, educational programs, consultation networks, and mentoring based on successful cooperative cases. The results contribute to understanding the limitations and opportunities of agricultural cooperation in Kazakhstan. They provide practical guidance for policymakers, cooperative managers, and rural stakeholders, supporting the transition from formal associations to effective business-oriented cooperatives. Further research should assess not only economic outcomes but also environmental sustainability, optimal cooperative models adapted to national specifics, and the impact of digital innovations on the transformation of rural cooperative systems.
Keywords: agricultural cooperation; farms; livestock; agricultural sector; economic efficiency; state support; Kazakhstan.
References.
- Statistics Bureau of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: https://stat.gov.kz
- Kozłowska-Burdziak, M., Przygodzka, R. (2019). Grupy producentów rolnych – szanse i bariery rozwoju: monografia. Białystok: Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Available at: https://repozytorium.uwb.edu.pl/jspui/bitstream/11320/8564/1/Grupy%20producent%C3%B3w%20rolnych%20-%20szanse%20i%20bariery%20rozwoju.pdf.
- On Agricultural Cooperatives: Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 372-V ZRK dated 29 October 2015. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/docs/Z1500000372.
- Rubaeva, O.D., Lilimberg, S.I. (2017). «Prospects of increase of efficiency of development of agricultural cooperation in the conditions of the new law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On agricultural cooperatives”». Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. № 7 (161). рр. 13-20.
- Esengalieva, S.M. (2018). «Organizational and economic aspects of agricultural cooperation development». Problems of the agricultural market. № 1. рр. 156-163. Available at: https://www.jpra-kazniiapk.kz/jour/article/viewFile/101/50.
- Kaliev, G.A., Akimbekova, G.U. (2018). «Agricultural cooperation in the Republic of Kazakhstan: problems and ways to solve them». Problems of the agricultural market. № 1. рр. 7-15. Available at: https://www.jpra-kazniiapk.kz/jour/article/download/81/30.
- (2024). Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 14,500 micro-loans issued under the Auyl Amanaty program in 2024: press release. Available at: https://www.gov.kz.
- Today. Analytical portal of the dairy industry. Available at: https://dairynews.today.
- (2023). National Statistics press release: The number of agricultural cooperatives has increased in Kazakhstan. DairyNews.today. Available at: https://dairynews.today/kz/news/v-kazakhstane-vyroslo-kolichestvo-selkhozkooperativov.html.
- Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: https://www.gov.kz.
- Tokenova, S., Mussina, R., Zhenskhan, D., Kadrinov, M., Gulnar, O. (2025). «The present state of development of agricultural cooperatives in Kazakhstan: Problems and Prospects». International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. № 8(6). рр. 113-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.9512.
- Zhenskhan, D., Bodaukhan, K., Lim, S., Appazova, G.Zh. (2025). «Assessment of the development of agricultural cooperatives in the regions of Kazakhstan and their impact on the living standards of rural residents». Bulletin of “Turan” University. № 3. рр. 387-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2025-1-3-387-402.
Quote article, APA style
Dyussegalieva B. Efficiency of agricultural cooperation in the livestock sector of Kazakhstan under institutional constraints. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2026. №2. 184-189 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-2-40
Quote article, MLA style
Dyussegalieva B. Efficiency of agricultural cooperation in the livestock sector of Kazakhstan under institutional constraints. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-2-40
