УДК: 352:321.7:005.44
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-2-45
Published: 31.05.2026
The relationship between democratic governance and sustainable development is traditionally discussed as a normative objective of public policy. However, conditions of prolonged crisis raise a more fundamental question: how can democratic institutions contribute to sustainable development while operating under continuous external pressure and uncertainty? This challenge is particularly relevant for Ukrainian territorial communities, where wartime conditions have increased the importance of local governance while testing its capacity to preserve legitimacy, participation and institutional continuity. The purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual framework that explains how adaptive democratic governance contributes to democratic resilience and, in turn, how democratic resilience creates conditions for sustainable development at the local level. The research is based on the synthesis of contemporary studies on democratic governance, resilience, local self-government, and sustainable development. The study argues that sustainable development should not be treated solely as an economic or social outcome of recovery processes. Instead, it should be viewed as the result of governance systems capable of maintaining democratic legitimacy, institutional adaptability, and citizen engagement. Particular attention is devoted to governance mechanisms that connect democratic resilience with sustainable development, including citizen participation in decision-making, transparency in resource allocation, cooperation with civil society, institutional learning, and digital support for communication and public services. As a result, the paper proposes a conceptual model consisting of four interconnected elements: adaptive democratic governance, democratic resilience, sustainability dimensions, and sustainable development. The model demonstrates that adaptive governance practices lay the foundations for democratic resilience, that democratic resilience generates institutional, social, and economic sustainability outcomes, and that sustainable development reinforces governance capacity and creates favorable conditions for further democratic adaptation. Unlike linear approaches to recovery and development, the proposed framework conceptualizes democracy and sustainability as mutually reinforcing and continuously evolving processes. The theoretical contribution of the study lies in integrating the concepts of adaptive governance, democratic resilience, and sustainable development into a single analytical framework applicable to territorial communities operating under crisis conditions. The proposed approach may be used for developing local governance strategies and community development policies aimed at strengthening resilience and sustainability in Ukraine and other contexts affected by external shocks.
Keywords: adaptive democratic governance, democratic resilience, sustainable development, territorial communities, local governance.
References.
- (2022). Rebuilding Ukraine by reinforcing regional and municipal governance. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/12/rebuilding-ukraine-by-reinforcing-regional-and-municipal-governance_63099658/63a6b479-en.pdf
- Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2005). Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: Core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development, 25(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.352
- Tereshchenko, T. (2024). Good democratic governance in Ukraine in the area of local self-government under wartime and post-war conditions. Public Administration and State Security Aspects, 2(18), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.52363/passa-2024.2-27
- Kunitsyn, O. (2025). Archetypes of Public Governance in the Concept of Financial Resilience of Territorial Communities of Ukraine. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Dayjest, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2025.3.03
- Gustafsson, M., Matveieva, O., Wihlborg, E., Borodin, Y., Mamatova, T., & Kvitka, S. (2025). Adaptive governance amidst the war: Overcoming challenges and strengthening collaborative digital service provision in Ukraine. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102056
- Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2026). Advancing public administration research: Integrating digital governance, institutional resilience, and participatory pathways for public value. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 92(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523261433893
- Dubyna, M., Matskiv, V., Kharchenko, Y., Shkyliov, D., Savchenok, V., & Shakun, E. (2026). Development of PFS in the conditions of digitalization and sustainability. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(66), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.66.2026.5021
- Ivančík, R., & Dušek, J. (2026). Sustainable development and democratic resilience in the European Union. Sustainability, 18(7), 3631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073631
- Marquardt, J., Pfeiffer, F., Blum, M., Daw, T. M., Dugasseh, F. A., Heitzig, J., Hysing, E., Jensen, I. H. B., Kulha, K., Langkjær, F., Lindvall, D., Nasiritousi, N., Schlosberg, D., Toikka, A., & Tønder, L. (2025). Reconciling democracy and sustainability: Three political challenges and the role of democratic innovations. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 21(1), Article 2504239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2504239
- Balasubramanian, P., Breuer, A., Leininger, J., Allen, C., & Kercher, J. (2022). Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16: A governance compass towards just transition? (IDOS Policy Brief No. 4/2022). German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS). https://doi.org/10.23661/ipb4.2022
- Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., Santana-Martins, M., Tato-Jiménez, J. L., & González-López, Ó. R. (2024). Strengthening resilience: Social responsibility and citizen participation in local governance. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100260
- Fransen, J., Hati, B., Simon, H. K., & van Stapele, N. (2024). Adaptive governance by community based organisations: Community resilience initiatives during Covid-19 in Mathare, Nairobi. Sustainable Development, 32(2), 1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2682
- Kulyk, A. (2024). Resilience of territorial communities as a factor in strengthening national security. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, 7(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-6998-2024-2-9
- Zayats, D. (2024). Decentralisation reform in Ukraine: Achievements and implementation prospects amidst war conditions. Democratic Governance, 17(2), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/2.2024.05
- Darkovich, A., Hatsko, V., Nesterenko, R., Bevziuk, D., & Ilnytska, I. (2025). Mapping Ukraine’s democratic space: Part 3. Civic activist perspectives on conditions in 40 localities (PeaceRep Ukraine Report). Conflict and Civicness Research Group, London School of Economics and Political Science & Kyiv School of Economics. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/KSE_LSE_Report_2025.pdf
- Kunitsyn, O. (2025). A conceptual framework for financial resilience strategies for Ukrainian territorial communities under wartime conditions. Efficiency of Public Administration, 3(84/85), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.36930/508405
- United Nations Development Programme. (2015). (Re)building core government functions in fragile and conflict affected settings: Local governance. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/rebuilding%20cgf%206%20local%20governance.pdf
- Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. (2022). Rebuilding Ukraine: Principles and policies. https://icps.com.ua/assets/uploads/images/files/rebuilding_ukraine.pdf
- Lindner, R., & Aichholzer, G. (2020). European e-democracy in practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8
- Gavkalova, N. L., Zolotaryova, I. O., & Kunitsyn, O. M. (2026). Rebuilding local democracy after crisis: governance resilience by technological transformation in territorial communities of Ukraine. Successes and Achievements in Science, 5(27), 998–1013. https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1254-2026-5(27)-998-1013
Quote article, APA style
Gavkalova N. L., Zolotaryova I. O., Kunitsyn O. M. From democratic resilience to sustainable development: evidence from Ukrainian territorial communities under wartime conditions. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2026. №2. 206-210 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-2-45
Quote article, MLA style
Gavkalova N. L., Zolotaryova I. O., Kunitsyn O. M. From democratic resilience to sustainable development: evidence from Ukrainian territorial communities under wartime conditions. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-2-45
