УДК: 338.48: 336. 27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2025-6-7
Published: 27.11.25
The tourism sector increasingly influences the socio-economic development of Ukraine’s regions, contributing to the diversification of local economies, strengthening investment attractiveness, and supporting cultural identity. The effectiveness of its development largely depends on the quality of public governance, particularly on the availability of practical tools for evaluating the outcomes of managerial decisions. Under current conditions, regions need to develop a balanced tourism policy grounded in reliable data, transparent analytical mechanisms, and coherent governance models. However, the absence of an integrated system of indicators, the diversity of evaluation approaches, the limited digitalization of management processes, and uneven institutional capacity complicate the formulation of practical decisions. The article aims to identify, systematize, and critically analyze conceptual approaches and methods for measuring the effectiveness of public governance, applicable to the development of the tourism sector at the regional level. The research is directed at comparing theoretical models and practical examples and at developing recommendations for establishing an integrated system of assessment indicators that reflects socio-economic conditions, institutional features, and the specific character of tourism policy in Ukrainian regions. The study draws on scientific publications, analytical reports, regional tourism development strategies, and open government data, enabling it to trace the application of various governance models in practice. The methodological basis includes systemic and comparative approaches, content analysis, and elements of institutional analysis, enabling a comprehensive assessment of existing approaches to measuring the effectiveness of public governance in the tourism sector. The study demonstrates that current approaches to assessing tourism governance are fragmented and lack a unified methodology suitable for regional application. Key shortcomings of existing indicator systems include uneven statistical support, insufficient integration of digital tools, and limited attention to institutional factors. The research emphasizes the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative indicators, using spatial development data, and forming adaptive assessment models capable of capturing the dynamics of tourism activity under crisis and post-crisis conditions.
Keywords: public governance, effectiveness, regional development, tourism sector, assessment indicators, institutional analysis, strategic planning, regional policy.
References.
- Rusnak O. A. (2024). Suchasni pidkhody do otsinky efektyvnosti publichnoho upravlinnia: problemy ta napriamy vdoskonalennia protsesiv otsiniuvannia [Modern approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of public administration: Problems and directions for improving assessment processes]. Publichne Uriaduvannia, Vol. 2, No. 39. Pp. 54–63. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2024-2(39)-7.
- Yaremko I. I. (2022). Efektyvnist publichnoho upravlinnia ta administruvannia: problemy ta napriamy vdoskonalennia protsesiv otsiniuvannia [Efficiency of public management and administration: Problems and directions for improving evaluation processes]. Menedzhment ta Pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini, Vol. 1, No. 7. Pp. 49–56. https://doi.org/10.23939/smeu2022.01.049.
- Nechaieva I. V., Hudz P. K. (2024). Krytychnyi ohliad metodiv otsinky efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia orhaniv publichnoi vlady [Critical review of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of public authorities’ functioning]. Publichne Upravlinnia: Kontseptsii, Paradyhma, Rozvytok, Udoskonalennia, No. 9. Pp. 107–122. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2024-9-107-122.
- Yatsenko V. V. (2016). Otsinka efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia turystychnoi destynatsii v Odeskomu rehioni: shliakhy rozvytku [Assessment of the effectiveness of tourism destination functioning in the Odesa region: Development paths]. Publichne Uriaduvannia, Vol. 3, No. 4. Pp. 207–215.
- Muzychenko-Kozlovska O. V., Pankiv Yu. M. (2025). Metodyka otsiniuvannia ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti vprovadzhennia resursooshchadnykh zakhodiv u turystychnii sferi [Methodology for assessing the economic efficiency of implementing resource-saving measures in the tourism sector]. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, No. 8. Pp. 184–203. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-8-184-203.
- Roik O. R. (2023). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti turystychnoi sfery Ukrainy v konteksti yevropeiskoi intehratsii [Assessment of the competitiveness of Ukraine’s tourism sector in the context of European integration]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Universytetu “Lvivska Politekhnika”. Seriia “Problemy Ekonomiky ta Upravlinnia”, Vol. 7, No. 2. Pp. 59–71. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2018.12.112.
- Kravtsiv V. S. (Ed.). (2024). Konkurentospromozhnist turystychno-rekreatsiinoi sfery Karpatskoho rehionu Ukrainy: otsinka, perspektyvy [Competitiveness of the tourism and recreational sector of the Carpathian region of Ukraine: Assessment and prospects]. Lviv: State Institution “Institute of Regional Research named after M. I. Dolishnii of NAS of Ukraine”. 223 p. Available at: https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20240002.pdf.
- Kolisnichenko N. V., Popov M. V. (2025). Vyklyky publichnoho upravlinnia turystychno-rekreatsiinoiu sferoiu v pisliavoiennyi period: dosvid Balkanskykh krain [Challenges of public management of the tourism and recreational sector in the post-war period: Experience of the Balkan countries]. Teoretychni ta Prykladni Pytannia Derzhavotvorennia, No. 33. Pp. 27–35. https://doi.org/10.35432/tisb332025322836.
- Karmanskyi A. K. (2024). Stan ta problemy publichnoho upravlinnia u haluzi zelenoho turyzmu: rehionalnyi aspekt [State and problems of public administration in the field of green tourism: Regional aspect]. Efektyvnist Derzhavnoho Upravlinnia, No. 1(78/79). Pp. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.36930/507808.
- Chaltseva O. O. (2023). Otsiniuvannia publichnoi polityky yak pokaznyk yii efektyvnosti: dosvid dlia Ukrainy [Evaluation of public policy as an indicator of its effectiveness: Experience for Ukraine]. Publichne Upravlinnia ta Mistseve Samovriaduvannia, No. 1. Pp. 63–68. https://doi.org/10.32782/2414-4436/2023-1-9.
- Popadynets N. M., Halachenko O. O., Danylo Ya. I. (2023). Turystychno-rekreatsiina diialnist: ekoloho-ekonomichni aspekty [Tourism and recreational activity: Environmental and economic aspects]. Rehionalna Ekonomika, No. 2(108). Pp. 117–124. https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2023-2-12.
- Garasymliuk M., Danylyshyn B., Martyniuk U., Makarovych V., Polivoda O., Nezveshchuk-Kohut T., Popadynets N. (2023). Non-price competitiveness factors in a value chain of a tourism product. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Vol. 14, No. 4. Pp. 1996–2003. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.14.4(68).11.
- Irtyshcheva I., Nadtochii I., Popadynets N., Hryshyna N., Sirenko I. (2022). European vector of economic development and management of tourist destinations’ competitiveness in digital economy. International Journal for Quality Research, Vol. 16, No. 4. Pp. 1211–1226. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.04-16.
Quote article, APA style
Slipetskyy M. Conceptual Approaches to Measuring the Effectiveness of Public Management of Tourism Development in the Region. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2025. №6. 32-36 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2025-6-7
Quote article, MLA style
Slipetskyy M. Conceptual Approaches to Measuring the Effectiveness of Public Management of Tourism Development in the Region. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2025-6-7
