Actual problems of innovative economy and law

Journal "Actual problems of innovative economy and law" is included in category B for specialties: in the field of knowledge "Management and administration": 073, 076 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 23.08.2023 No. 1035) and 071, 072, 075 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 12.20.2023 No. 1543); in the field of knowledge "Social and behavioral sciences" 051 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated August 23, 2023 No. 1035); in the field of knowledge "Law" - 081 and "Public management and administration" - 281 (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 12.20.2023 No. 1543).
Registration of an entity in print media: Decision of the National Council of Ukraine on Television and Radio Broadcasting No. 1390 dated 11/16/2023. Media identifier: R30-02018
The journal is indexed in the International Scientific Center of Index Copernicus International

Classification of hybrid threats as a basis for the formation of enterprise security management mechanisms

УДК: 005.934:005.334:658

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-3-19

Lyzun Ruslan,
PhD candidate in the OP "Management",
Poltava University of Economics and Trade,
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7848-1160


The article investigates theoretical approaches to the classification of hybrid threats within the enterprise security management system. It is substantiated that the contemporary security environment is characterized by a combination of economic, digital, informational, psychological, personnel-related, and logistical influences that create a complex system of interconnected risks. The study demonstrates that existing approaches to threat classification are primarily developed within the framework of national security, international relations, and cybersecurity, while insufficiently considering the specific features of enterprise functioning under conditions of wartime economy, digital transformation, and increasing environmental uncertainty. Based on the analysis of foreign and Ukrainian scientific research, an authorial approach to the classification of hybrid threats is proposed. The classification is developed according to the source of origin, sphere of influence, nature of impact, speed of implementation, duration, controllability, and scale of consequences. It is argued that such a multidimensional approach enables a more comprehensive understanding of the complex and nonlinear nature of hybrid threats affecting enterprise activities. The study identifies the main groups of hybrid threats to enterprises, including economic, digital, informational, personnel-related, psychological, logistical, energy, legal, regulatory, and reputational threats. It is emphasized that these threats do not exist independently but interact with each other, generating cascading effects and increasing the overall level of uncertainty within the enterprise environment. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between hybrid threats and enterprise security management mechanisms. The article substantiates that the classification of threats should serve not only as an analytical tool but also as a foundation for the formation of appropriate security management mechanisms. An authorial matrix of correspondence between hybrid threats and security management mechanisms is developed, which allows determining priority managerial responses to various categories of threats. The results of the study prove that the effectiveness of enterprise security management depends on the degree of integration of strategic, risk-oriented, personnel, digital, informational, communication, crisis-management, and adaptive-resilience mechanisms. The proposed classification provides a theoretical basis for developing security-oriented management systems, assessing enterprise adaptive resilience, and designing integrated security management models under hybrid threats.

Keywords: hybrid threats, security management, enterprise security, economic security, security-oriented management, adaptive resilience, resilience, risk management, cybersecurity, crisis management, enterprise security management mechanisms, hybrid risk classification.

References.

  1. Khidasheli, T. (2024). Hybrid Threats and Resilience. Tbilisi: Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom South Caucasus. https://www.freiheit.org/sites/default/files/2024-12/hybrid-threats-and-resilience-final.pdf.
  2. (2025). Countering Hybrid Threats. Brussels: NATO. https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/countering-hybrid-threats.
  3. Giannopoulos, G., Smith, H., & Theocharidou, M. (2021). The Landscape of Hybrid Threats: A Conceptual Model. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/44985.
  4. Karpenko, O. (2024). European experience in countering hybrid threats for Ukraine’s economic recovery. International Economic Policy, (41), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.33111/iep.2024.41.12.
  5. Le, T. D., Nguyen, H., & Tran, P. (2025). Cybersecurity analytics for the enterprise environment: A systematic literature review. Electronics, 14(11), Article 2252. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112252.
  6. Spivak, S. (2025). Improving the strategy of economic security management of enterprises under martial law. Galician Economic Bulletin, 97(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2025.06.211.
  7. Krylov, D. (2024). Characteristics of threats to the economic security of enterprises in modern conditions. Problems of Modern Transformations. Series: Economics and Management, (13), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5738-2024-13-04-07.

Quote article, APA style

Lyzun R. Classification of hybrid threats as a basis for the formation of enterprise security management mechanisms. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. 2026. №3. 110-114 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-3-19

Quote article, MLA style

Lyzun R. Classification of hybrid threats as a basis for the formation of enterprise security management mechanisms. Actual problems of innovative economy and law. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-3-19